Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 11:28:50 -0400 To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: mailing list uniqueness/request (NOT GOING TO HAPPEN) Message-ID: <20000428112850.A1325@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Mail-Followup-To: cgf@cygnus.com, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com References: <3909A983.AD2A0C2@home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i In-Reply-To: ; from thelittleprince@asteroid-b612.org on Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 11:17:08AM -0400 On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 11:17:08AM -0400, The Little Prince wrote: >On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, David A. Cobb wrote: >> Please allow me to add my vote in favor. [CW] however could be >> ambiguous, [cygwin] would be better. In general the [www-] lists do >> this as do [PDF-] lists. It's a BIG help when sifting thru the 300 >> 'grams a day I get from the tech lists I watch. > >yeah, i thought of [cygwin] too, just thought it would cut off more of the >subject in the Pine index than it would need to, i really dont know how >many people use pine, i'm just just speaking for me. and yes, i know, i >could just configure pine to do something comparable, like change the >index-format setting to put the sender: header somewhere in the >index listing, but I didn't feel like it, and it makes my listing look >weird from what i've been used to for 5 years. >if you do it, great..if not, fine too, i'm not gonna commit suicide or >anything :) There is no need to continue this thread. We will not be mangling the subject for this mailing list. That is completely and irrevocably final. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com