Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:27:24 -0400 To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.1.0 gdb troubles Message-ID: <20000419192724.A17027@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Mail-Followup-To: cgf@cygnus.com, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com References: <200004191421.KAA22811@envy.delorie.com> <0925.000419@is.lg.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.8i In-Reply-To: <0925.000419@is.lg.ua>; from paul-ml@is.lg.ua on Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 10:13:02PM +0300 On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 10:13:02PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >>> Almost any POSIX feature maps one-to-one to win32 one and difference >>> is only in some idiosyncratic details. > >DD> This is an understatement. For every feature that maps one-to-one, it >DD> seems like there are a dozen idiosyncratic details that make it >DD> difficult to meet the POSIX requirements. A large portion of Cygwin >DD> is devoted to these details. > > Well, we won't argue on precise number of details and level of >difficulty to work them around. Nope. We'll just make vague assertions that cygwin could do it much better and that will be that. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com