Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:04:03 -0500 To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Cygwin performance (was [ANN] PW32 the...) Message-ID: <20000315000403.A3982@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Mail-Followup-To: cgf@cygnus.com, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com References: <20000313180414.15800.qmail@web107.yahoomail.com> <20000313180414.15800.qmail@web107.yahoomail.com> <9886.000313@is.lg.ua> <4.3.2.20000313181326.00b8a590@pop.ma.ultranet.com> <20000313185555.B24233@cygnus.com> <38CD87BE.B69B05A7@sigma6.com> <20000313180831.I8690@cygnus.com> <19940315002847.279871F1B@sabami.seaslug.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.8i In-Reply-To: <19940315002847.279871F1B@sabami.seaslug.org>; from scott@sabmail.rresearch.com on Mon, Mar 14, 1994 at 04:28:47PM -0800 On Mon, Mar 14, 1994 at 04:28:47PM -0800, Scott Blachowicz wrote: >Geoffrey Noer wrote: > >> ... >> Interesting. We have been trying to improve (and succeeding in improving) >> Cygwin's runtime performance but that's been done comparing Cygwin to >> Cygwin-past and not so much by doing benchmarks against other systems I >> think. > >Great! Have you found any way to improve the performance of commands like 'ls' >against remotely mounted file systems? I frequently have things like I think Geoff was referring to improvements that are already in Cygwin. If you don't see any changes then there aren't any improvements. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com