Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:05:00 -0500 To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 released Message-ID: <20000313110500.G1005@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Mail-Followup-To: cgf@cygnus.com, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com References: <6632.000313@is.lg.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.8i In-Reply-To: <6632.000313@is.lg.ua>; from paul-ml@is.lg.ua on Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:10:26PM +0200 Hmm. I would like to receive opinions on whether people consider this announcement to be off-topic. We don't see any DJGPP announcments here. We don't see any UWIN or Interix traffic. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think that Mikey announced here, either. (How's that for giving a plug to all of cygwin's competitors?) I don't think that announcements of (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layers are on topic here but if everyone else disagrees, my opinion can be changed. cgf On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >I would like to introduce to gnu-win32 community new (yet another) >POSIX "emulation" layer. It is product of some thoughts and ideas that >were spoken, and sufficiently criticized, on cygwin list. Standard >description follows: -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com