Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
From: N8TM@aol.com
Message-ID: <57.210e428.25ddd4ba@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 17:48:26 EST
Subject: Re: Is Cygwin 1.0 compatible with Windows 2000
	ProfessionalWorkstation ?
To: corinna@vinschen.de, michel.debar@fundp.ac.be
CC: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

In a message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2000  5:08:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, Corinna Vinschen <corinna@vinschen.de> writes:

> 
> Yes.
> 
> Corinna
> 
> 
> 
> --
But I don't reproduce the same bugs on W2K RC2 as on NT4SP5, running identical cygwin installations and tests (i.e. a few bugs from NT4 disappeared on W2K, with RC2 better than beta 3).  Not to mention that W2K runs scripts much faster than NT4.

Tim
tprince@computer.org



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com