Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
From: N8TM@aol.com
Message-ID: <0.b515680a.256eed39@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:51:21 EST
Subject: Re: Re[2]: cygwin on 95 slower than NT
To: paul-ml@is.lg.ua, skumar2@hotmail.com
CC: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 31

In a message dated 11/25/99 11:56:21 AM EST, paul-ml@is.lg.ua writes:

> EB> Real Solution: Migrate the Win95 to WinNT.
>  
>      Tell that my boss.
>  
>  EB> Win95 itself is slower than WinNT. 

Not necessarily, but Win2K should run faster.

Tim
tprince@computer.org

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com