Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Message-ID: <000201bf32e7$b61f4500$1b003cd4@theunknown>
From: "s.rekow" <s.rekow@sh-home.de>
To: "Allan S Iverson" <allaniverson@sprynet.com>,
        "Cygwin Mail List" <cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
References: <004701bf3179$cf3dc940$1638aec7@discordian>
Subject: Re: Help compiling TCL 8.0.3 with GCC-2.95.2 Upgrade
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 17:12:24 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I am trying to compile TCL 8.0.4 using Cygwin b20 with GCC-2.95.2
downloaded from
> www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/software/gnu-win32/.

maybe off-topic but:
Jeffrey Hobbs, tcl-corehacker at scriptics.com wrote somewhere:
"There is actually a buglet in 8.0.4 (not 8.0.5) and 8.1-8.2.0 (fixed
in 8.2.1) where the above cases are equal (both will be compiled).
Tcl was being overaggressive in trying to compile procs, and was
deciding that simple $vars are OK to compile in.  This is actually
not true, since expr has always had double-evaluation semantics.

8.0.5 and 8.2.1+ will behave as expected, the others will not."

tcl8.0.5 is the last patchlvl for 8.0, tcl8.1 - 8.2.0 are not very stable
and tcl8.2.2 also fixed a bunch of memleaks
uhm, maybe you should use tcl8.0.5 or 8.2.2?

Regards,
S.Rekow


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com