Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
From: JSONCRAIG@aol.com
Message-ID: <0.51b99ea6.255de33e@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 16:40:14 EST
Subject: more problems with gprof
To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 10

Are -pg and gprof fully implemented in Mingw32?  I tried to profile a simple 
C program (compiling/linking with -pg, running it, running gprof) and it 
always says no time accumulated and 0% of the programs running time was spent 
in each function on the call graph.  Now, I know this can't be right because 
they were all called multiple times.  
gprof -i test.exe returns:
File `gmon.out' (version 0) contains:
        3 histogram record
        1 call-graph record
        0 basic-block count records <----- is this the problem?

Is it fully implemented or am I doing something wrong?

Thanks,
Jason Craig

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

