Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Reply-To: <ssiddiqi@ipass.net>
From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <ssiddiqi@inspirepharm.com>
To: "Cygwin@Sourceware. Cygnus. Com" <cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: X11 for cygwin CD 1.0
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 19:40:24 -0500
Message-ID: <LOBBLPGIHMIEGBEAFDMCKEKMCBAA.ssiddiqi@inspirepharm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

I must have missed the following message.
The termcap problem you are reporting could be because of \r\n
issues.

I really doubt libs from pre-alpha-xfree-cygwin-b201.tar.bz2 would work
without problems.  If you are using on DLLs for your X-applications
then it is ok.  For porting X apps from UNIX you might get _ctype_
undefined references, becasue the X11libs and clinets were compiled
with B20.1.

Suhaib

------------------------------------------------------------------------
X11 for cygwin CD 1.0
To: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com 
Subject: X11 for cygwin CD 1.0 
From: Steve Jorgensen <steve at khoral dot com> 
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 12:40:55 -0600 (MDT) 

	I know that this list has been told to use the
	x11r6.4-cygwin-ss-dev.tar.gz version of Xwindows for the cygwin
	1.0 cd, but before it was discussed on this list, I found the
	pre-alpha-xfree-cygwin-b20.1.tar.bz2 version.  While the Xserver
	itself is in the pre-alpha stages, the libraries and clients seem
	to work as well or better than the x11r6.4-cygwin-ss-dev.tar.gz
	version.  Is there some reason why we should not use this
	pre-alpha-xfree-cygwin-b20.1 version?

	The x11r6.4-cygwin-ss-dev.tar.gz version can't run xterm, it just
	complains about not being able to find an appropriate termcap
	entry, even after I added one.	Also the header files produce
	tons of annoying warnings, because they lack return types on
	several function declarations, which produce warnings about
	assuming int for the return type.

	I thinking about sticking with the pre-alpha version,
	because the above reasons, but I wanted to make sure
	there aren't any hidden gotcha's.. :)  Thanks for any
	information.

					Steve


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com