Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Message-Id: <199908061636.LAA05812@mercury.xraylith.wisc.edu>
To: Anders Norlander <anorland@hem2.passagen.se>
cc: Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com,
        Harold Weissfield <h_weissfield@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Memory Violation With Windres and Shared Data Segments 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Aug 1999 18:51:21 +0200."
             <37AB1289.4EBCA966@hem2.passagen.se> 
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 11:36:14 -0500
From: Mumit Khan <khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU>

Anders Norlander <anorland@hem2.passagen.se> writes:
> Just naming a section shared doesn't actually make it shared. There is a
> bit that
> has to be set in order to make a section shared. Unfortunately I don't
> remember
> more right now.

I believe the only difference is that it has the "SHARED" bit set in 
the section attributes, in addition to the usual initialized data,
read-write, etc flags.

Can someone send me a testcase so I can see if my local changes fix this
or not? If it's obvious already, I know nothing about these shared 
segments.

Regards,
Mumit


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com