Subject: RE: size_of_stack_reserve SEGV
From: Heribert Dahms <[email-masked]>
To: "'Chris Faylor'" <[email-masked]>, Christoph Kukulies <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 02:00:25 +0200

Hi Chris,

exactly like under Unix?
Does "gdb foo core" work now as expected?

Bye, Heribert ([email-masked])

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Chris Faylor [SMTP:[email-masked]]
> Sent:	Friday, July 30, 1999 00:21
> To:	Christoph Kukulies
> Cc:	[email-masked]
> Subject:	Re: size_of_stack_reserve SEGV
> 
> On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 07:17:58PM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> >I compiled flex.exe and generated a lexer. (I'm just mentioning
> >because (f)lex needs much stack often.)
> >
> >My lexer (which runs fine under unix) dumps core under NT (4.0),
> >Cygwin B.20.
> >
> >
> >I skimmed the FAQ for the work _size_of_stack to no avail.
> 
> Run.  Your.  Program.  Under.  GDB.  Just.  Like.  You.  Would.
> Under.  UNIX.  If.  You.  Had.  A.  Similar.  Problem.
> 
> Beep.
> cgf
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to [email-masked]

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to [email-masked]