Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Message-ID: <374A45F1.FC2606AD@mcd.alcatel.be> Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 08:40:49 +0200 From: Richard Hickling X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mumit Khan CC: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Make References: <199905241903.OAA04345@pluto.xraylith.wisc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Is the 'define'/'endef' construct a part of GNU > > 'make'? > > If so, is that version part of the latest Cygwin > > binary distribution? > The answer is yes. > Wonder what would take longer -- test out your copy of make to see if it > does indeed support this feature (or look at the gnumake docs, which are > also available on the web), or post a request to see if someone else would > do it for you? My 'make' does not support this feature. I have been told the newest ones should. The info documentation on 'make' (that I have) does not mention 'define'/'endef', however. Thus, I was confused. It would certainly take time and waste bandwidth to download various versions of 'make', install them and test them. In comparison, anyone who knew that this feature existed would waste about 10 seconds to click 'Reply' (or 'Reply All' if they saw fit) and type 'yes'. Thank you for your answer. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com