Delivered-To: listarch-cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com From: Christopher Faylor Message-ID: <19990215231439.B11574@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 23:14:39 -0500 To: dwsharp@iee.org, gnu-win32 Subject: Re: sources References: <36C856B3.E5010221@dddandr.octacon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <36C856B3.E5010221@dddandr.octacon.co.uk>; from Don Sharp on Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 05:17:39PM +0000 On Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 05:17:39PM +0000, Don Sharp wrote: >As Chris is in denial mode wrt ash I'll need to have a go at fixing the >missing character problem in the pattern match. (He is right in saying >that it isn't something that the Bourne shell can do anyway so what/who >decides the correct behaviour is possibly a moot point). Denial mode? You want ash to handle the same substitutions as bash. It isn't going to happen. As to who decides the correct behavior, it's not a moot point. It's me. If someone can point me to some documentation that proves that ash is not working like a standard UNIX /bin/sh, then I'll be happy to change my mind. cgf