Subject: Re: G77 fork problems
From: [email-masked] (Suhaib M. Siddiqi)

21 Jan 1999 01:42:22 -0800
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Craig Burley" <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>,
        <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>

Yes for your first comment.
Second, i was thanking him.  He deserves many more thanks for his
friendly and detailed answers whenever I wrote to him.

And by the way thanks to you to for this kind of e-mail.

Suhaib

 Original Message -----
From: Craig Burley <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
<[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: G77 fork problems

>>Actually G77 way of handeling FORK makes more sense to
>>me -- personally.
>
>Could you elaborate?  I thought Mumit had explained g77 *doesn't*
provide
>a wrapper for fork().  Do you mean you prefer the interface Mumit
>provided in his (sample) wrapper?  If so, he's the one to thank, not
>g77!
>
>        tq vm, (burley)
>-
>For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message
to
>"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".
>

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".