Subject: Re: G77 fork problems
From: [email-masked] (Craig Burley)

20 Jan 1999 04:13:31 -0800
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
        [email-masked], [email-masked]

>Actually G77 way of handeling FORK makes more sense to
>me -- personally.

Could you elaborate?  I thought Mumit had explained g77 *doesn't* provide
a wrapper for fork().  Do you mean you prefer the interface Mumit
provided in his (sample) wrapper?  If so, he's the one to thank, not
g77!

        tq vm, (burley)
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".