Subject: test_installed run on egcs-1.1.1 binary
From: [email-masked]

7 Jan 1999 05:37:57 -0800
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: [email-masked]

configuration:
NT4/SP3
cygwin-b20.1
egcs-1.1.1 binary from Khan
autoconf-2.13
make-3.77
expect and tcl rebuilt from dev-src

remark:  the make in Mumit Khan's distribution seems better on
W95 than the one in cywin-b20.1, but it misses some of the
recursive installation steps even on NT.  patch from
cygwin-b20.1 appears solid on NT, but is giving a little trouble on
W95.

egcs testsuite runs go further than before, with fewer (apparently
spurious) errors reported, but still terminate prematurely.
Dr. Timothy C. Prince
Consulting Engineer
Solar Turbines, a Caterpillar Company
alternate e-mail: [email-masked]
                === gcc tests ===

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/900409-1.c execution,  -O0

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            1514
# of unexpected failures        2
Test Run By Unknown on Wed Jan  6 14:42:59 1999

                === g++ tests ===

FAIL: g++.benjamin/bool01.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.benjamin/bool02.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.bob/delete1.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.bob/packed1.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.bob/template4.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.brendan/bit-fields2.C .* , (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.brendan/code-gen1.C  Execution test

                === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            80
# of unexpected failures        7
# of untested testcases         1

                === g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes            161

           To:                                              INTERNET - IBMMAIL
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".