Subject: Re: gcc produces foo.exe, not foo
From: [email-masked] (Fergus Henderson)

30 Sep 1998 08:04:18 -0700
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: [email-masked]
Cc: gw32 <[email-masked]>

On 28-Sep-1998, Earnie Boyd <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Is their a reverse of the linker option --force-exe-suffix?
> 
> I've tried --noforce-exe-suffix and that doesn't work.

Did you try `--no-force-exe-suffix'?
                 ^

-- 
Fergus Henderson <[email-masked]>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger [email-masked]        |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".