Subject: Re: gcc produces foo.exe, not foo
From: [email-masked] (Earnie Boyd)

29 Sep 1998 07:06:57 -0700
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Reply-To: [email-masked]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: gw32 <[email-masked]>

Is their a reverse of the linker option --force-exe-suffix?

I've tried --noforce-exe-suffix and that doesn't work.

You can create a filename without an extension by appending a .
character to the name but this would not be very convenient.
==
-                \\||//
-----------o0O0--Earnie--0O0o------------
--        [email-masked]        --
-- http://freeyellow.com/members5/gw32 --
--------------ooo0O--O0ooo---------------

PS: Newbie's, you should visit my page.
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".