Subject: Re: Windows98 + inetutils
From: [email-masked] (Hilton Fernandes)

29 Sep 1998 05:23:56 -0700
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <[email-masked]>
Reply-To: Hilton Fernandes <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
To: Olle Olsson <[email-masked]>
Cc: Stipe Tolj <[email-masked]>, [email-masked],
        Hilton Fernandes <[email-masked]>

On 22 Sep 98 at 14:56, Olle Olsson <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Being able to mimic an  ordinary Unix way of handling users/groups/passwords/... via
> "/etc"-files seems like useful approach. The core API functionality remains the same
> to a large extent, the difference is only in where things are stored and updated.
> 
> To what extent can one have *one* implementation of the API? What if there are /etc
> files on an NT, should these or the NT-owned structures be used. Presumably, as
> Windows95 (Windows98?) is weak on security, the NT-way of handling it should be used
> on the NT, while on Windows9x the file-based approach is taken. This would enable a
> wider portability, something that simplifies management of the system.
> 
> /olle
> 

Hello!

Sorry for an empty message. :-(  As the great Forrest Gump would 
say, Shit happens! :-)

It's possible that someone that uses MS-Windows 9X isn't particularly
afraid of security problems; otherwise, he or she would prefer NT or
some other OS.  Indeed, any user of a Windows 9X OS is already a
priviledged user that can do anything to the system.

So, maybe there isn't any additional problem with a non secure access
to Windows 9X.

Regards,
--Hilton

----
Hilton Fernandes
[email-masked]
[email-masked]
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lakes/5657
URLs and help on C++ programming and Object-Oriented Design
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".