Subject: Re: Windows98 + inetutils
From: [email-masked] (Olle Olsson)

22 Sep 1998 22:37:27 -0700
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Hilton Fernandes <[email-masked]>
Cc: Stipe Tolj <[email-masked]>, [email-masked],
        Hilton Fernandes <[email-masked]>

Being able to mimic an  ordinary Unix way of handling users/groups/passwords/... via
"/etc"-files seems like useful approach. The core API functionality remains the same
to a large extent, the difference is only in where things are stored and updated.

To what extent can one have *one* implementation of the API? What if there are /etc
files on an NT, should these or the NT-owned structures be used. Presumably, as
Windows95 (Windows98?) is weak on security, the NT-way of handling it should be used
on the NT, while on Windows9x the file-based approach is taken. This would enable a
wider portability, something that simplifies management of the system.

/olle

Hilton Fernandes wrote:

> On 13 Sep 98 at 22:31, Stipe Tolj <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> > > But it gets the password from the NT SAM !
> >
> > yes, it does on NT. But since I'm on an Win98 box, I'm using a patched login.c
> > file in my case.
> >
>
> Hello Stipe,
>
> that would be a good addition to CygWin.  It add one more feature
> for the poor Win 9X user, previously available only for the NT
> users.
>
> What Cygnus people think about it?
>
> Regards,
> --Hilton
>
> > --
> > Stipe Tolj <[email-masked]>

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".