Subject: Re: mounts, ls, and filename completion
From: [email-masked]

21 Aug 1998 15:12:25 -0700
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]

In a message dated 8/20/98 4:39:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[email-masked] writes:

> How about just documenting the behavior of the mount command?

and the similarities and differences of symlink (ln -s)
I get the impression that one can't count on it working after the contains of
a symlinked file are changed.  Maybe that's why mount is recommended, but
mount is too permanent, while ln -s is too impermanent.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".