Subject: RE: -mwindows option
From: [email-masked] (Rick Rankin)

6 Jun 1998 22:42:23 -0700
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Mumit Khan" <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>

Thanks. I was unaware that this was being addressed.

Rick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mumit Khan [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Saturday, June 06, 1998 8:50 AM
> To: Rick Rankin
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: -mwindows option
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Rick Rankin wrote:
>
> > I can certainly deal with that, but at best it seems
> inconsistent IMHO. It
> > seem to the that the compiler driver program (i.e., gcc) should be smart
> > enough to know which options to pass to which phase.
> >
>
> Both -mwindows and -mdll are handled inconsistently, and will be fixed in
> egcs-1.1 (the compile only stage will ignore the options).
>
> Regards,
> Mumit
>

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".