Subject: RE: times() under Win95
From: [email-masked] (Richard H. Gumpertz)

9 May 1998 11:12:03 -0700
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <01BD7B66.44E411C0@sos>
To: [email-masked] (Sergey Okhapkin)
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]

> Richard H. Gumpertz wrote:
> > Does anybody have a working version of times() for Windows 95?  It currently
> > seems to work only under NT.  The user and system times returned appear to be
> > garbage under Windows 95.
> > 
> 
> W95 doesn't support accumulating of process's times.
> 
> -- 
> Sergey Okhapkin, http://www.lexa.ru/sos
> Moscow, Russia

So how about returning "reasonable" fake values.  For example, perhapsreturn
the real time in the user time and zero in the system time?  (Maybe the
revewrse might make sense with Win95?)  If nothing else, at least return zero
in all for CPU time fields rather than garbage!

-- 
 ==========================================================================
 | Richard H. Gumpertz, PhD        VOICE:(913) 642-1777 or (913) 534-5062 |
 | Computer Problem Solving        FAX:  (913) 752-6615 or (913) 642-8777 |
 | 4518 West 89th Street, Suite 220                                       |
 | Prairie Village, KS 66207-2293                     E-MAIL: [email-masked] |
 ==========================================================================
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".