Subject: ctype.h and serious programming
From: [email-masked]

16 Feb 1998 21:43:13 -0800
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: [email-masked]

If you've done some porting to cygwin, you'll notice that ctype.h often
gives syntax errors.  Out of curiosity, I substituted <linux/ctype.h>
from the linux kernel source for the cygwin version (leaving the cygwin
headers in place), and got much cleaner compiles.  Is there a technical
reason why <linux/ctype.h>, which is a pure macro version, shouldn't
replace cygwin's <ctype.h>?

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".