Subject: Fw: lcc-win32 vs. mingw32/gnuwin32
From: [email-masked] (Joshua Little)

18 Jan 1998 11:31:48 -0800
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: <[email-masked]>

-----Original Message-----
From: Gunther Ebert <[email-masked]>
To: Joshua J Little <[email-masked]>
Date: Thursday, December 11, 1997 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: lcc-win32 vs. mingw32/gnuwin32

>Hi,
>
>I would also prefer lcc rather than gcc/mingw32 but lcc lacks
>C++. I don't know of any other disadvantages.
>
>Gunther
>
>Joshua J Little wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone out there have any experience with the c compiler lcc for
>> compiling vanilla win32 C code?  It seems to make much smaller
>> executables, compiles a lot faster, and, at least for the examples in
>> Petzold's "Programming Windows 95," it compiles the code pretty much
right
>> out-of-the-box, unlike mingw32 or gnuwin32.  Are there any disadvantages
>> to it that anyone knows of?  Any advice anyone can offer?
>>         Thanks in advance for the help.
>>
>> Josh Little
>> [email-masked]
>>
>> -
>> For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
>> "[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".
>
>--
>
>Gunther Ebert
>iXOS Anwendungs-Software GmbH
>Angerstrasse 40-42
>D-04177 Leipzig
>
>Phone : +49 341 48503-0
>Fax   : +49 341 48503-99
>E-mail: mailto:[email-masked]
>www   : http://www.ixos-leipzig.de
>

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".