Subject: RE: using times()
From: [email-masked] (Valery Fine)

22 Sep 1997 05:18:58 -0700
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <01BCC761.F51A54F0@sos>
Reply-To: [email-masked]
To: Sergey Okhapkin <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]

On 22 Sep 97 at 14:15, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:

> Valery Fine wrote:
> > On 22 Sep 97 at 8:33, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > times() call works on NT only. The underlying syscall
> > > GetProcessTimes() unimplemented on windows 95. The output of your
> > > examle looks the following on my box (NT4.0 SP3):
> > 
> >   Probably like this would be better then just ZERO:
> > 
> 
> I'm not sure. Probably, it's better to return -1 and to set errno to
> ENOSYS, rather than return incorrect value.

  It would be as correct as the user's OS (namely Win95) provides
  Since calling that API user wants (I guess) to estimate the time 
                                                 ========
  and this incorrect value may help him but  ENOSYS ?

  Anyway it can not be absolutely precise value for any system. There 
is some error anyway. This error will be large for Win95. For this 
case the 

                "REAL exact value" <= "supplied"

 and it will be not far from the real one if the user's system is 
 running a single process.

 Is it wrong ?
                   Valery
Dr. Valeri Faine (Valery Fine)
    ------------ -------------   Phone: +41 22 767 4921
CERN                             FAX  : +41 22 767 7155
CH-1211 Geneva, 23               mailto:[email-masked] 
Switzerland                      http://nicewww.cern.ch/~fine
                                 
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".