Subject: Re: Vt100 ?
From: [email-masked] (Mikey)

24 Aug 1997 23:24:45 -0700
Approved: [email-masked]
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <[email-masked]>
Reply-To: [email-masked]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Original-To: [email-masked], [email-masked]
In-Reply-To: <[email-masked]>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.01/32.397
Original-Sender: [email-masked]

just put B18 termcap in /etc
and set TERM to linux in
~/.bashrc

On Fri, 22 Aug 1997 15:24:12 +0200, you wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I am happily running Sergey's bash (GNU bash, version 2.01.0(4)-release
>(i386-pc-cygwin32)), But i would be even more happy if my $TERM would be
>set to vt100 or better. 'less' seems not to cope with the currently
>'dumb' Terminal. Are there plans to give the bash vt100 capabilities per
>default? 
>Where is (if at all) a vt100-emaulation for NT?
>
>Thanks for any help
>
>Erwin
>-- 
>|Erwin Achermann                        phone:  +41-1-632 74 40      |
>|Institute of Scientific Computing      fax:    +41-1-632 11 72      |
>|ETH Zurich, IFW C29.2                  mailto:[email-masked]  |
>|8092 Zurich, Switzerland  http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/acherman  |
>-
>For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
>"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".
>

([email-masked])
delete REMOVETHIS from the above to reply
         Mikey
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".