Subject: Re: Revised Cygwin32 licensing terms
From: [email-masked] (Jan-Jaap van der Heijden)

11 Jul 1997 12:04:30 -0700
Approved: [email-masked]
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Reply-To: Jan-Jaap van der Heijden <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Original-To: Gordon Irlam <[email-masked]>
Original-cc: GNU-Win32 list <[email-masked]>, GPC list <[email-masked]>
In-Reply-To: <[email-masked]>
Original-Sender: [email-masked]

On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, Gordon Irlam wrote:

> 
> The new licensing terms for Cygwin32 permits anyone to make use of Cygwin32
> without adhering to the GPL, and without being required to make their
> sources available, provided that in so doing they are not attempting to
> directly compete with Cygnus.  The reason we decided it was necessary to
> prevent the use of Cygwin32 by companies that are competing directly with
> Cygnus is explained below.
> 
> Cygnus specializes in the provision of development tools for embedded
> systems. Cygnus is responsible for perhaps 80% of all on going GCC
> development, and 95% of all GDB development.  We commercialize our
> development efforts through our GNUPro compiler tool chain.  Other people and
> organizations contribute to, and benefits from our work.
> 

Translating into readable English, I read here: "You are not allowed to
create competing development tools based on cygwin32"

How does this affect other GNU compilers, like GNU Pascal and GNU Fortran?

I created and maintain the (cygwin32 based) win32 port of GNU Pascal.
We will surely try to convert the world to Pascal ;-)

Will it violate the new license terms to use cygwin32?

J.J. van der Heijden

---
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going
to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead.  -- RFC1925.

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".