Subject: gnu-win32 vs OpenNT 2.0
From: [email-masked] (Bill Hunter)

15 Apr 1997 17:39:39 -0700
Approved: [email-masked]
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <01BC49C7.956B7BA0.cygnus.gnu-win32@BILLHOME>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Original-To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by cygnus.com id OAA01541
Original-Sender: [email-masked]

Has anyone compared gnu-win32 to attempted commercial equivalent(s)?  I'm seem to recall that the recently released OpenNT 2.0 - purported to be a *NIX clone that runs under and cooperates with Windows NT - was going to be written with some special blessing (and knowledge transfer) from Microsoft.  Has it benefited from this?  Is it more stable than the admirable-but-still-beta gnu-win32?

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".