Subject: Re: GNU Editor
From: [email-masked] (Bob Crispen)

28 Mar 1997 21:46:39 -0800
Approved: [email-masked]
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <[email-masked]>
Reply-To: [email-masked]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
Original-To: Matt Estela <[email-masked]>
Original-CC: [email-masked]
Original-Sender: [email-masked]

Matt Estela wrote:

> No contest. Vim.
[snip]
> No, emacs is better.
> No no, vim.
> emacs.
> vim.
> emacs.
> vim.
> notepad. oh crap, sorry, i meant emacs.
> vim.

cat >foo.c

The *manly* editor.  Only if the system crashes are you
permitted to

cat >>foo.c

--
Rev. Bob "Bob" Crispen
[email-masked]
"Cogito Eggo sum"
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".