Subject: newlib vs glibc
From: [email-masked] (Fergus Henderson)

26 Mar 1997 09:59:56 -0800
Approved: [email-masked]
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text
Original-To: [email-masked] (gnu-win32)
In-Reply-To: <[email-masked]> from "Jim Balter" at Mar 25, 97 03:53:34 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Original-Sender: [email-masked]

Jim Balter wrote:
> 
> [...bug in bsearch()...]  A better fix is to replace bsearch.c
> with the simpler, more efficient, and more comprehendable one from
> glibc (in fact, all of newlib should be replaced with glibc, but that's
> another story):

So why do we have two C libraries?

-- 
Fergus Henderson <[email-masked]>   |  "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>   |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger [email-masked]         |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".