Subject: RE: ITIMER Implementation???
From: [email-masked] (Michael Traffanstead)

5 Dec 1996 00:39:45 -0800
Sender: [email-masked]
Approved: [email-masked]
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Disclaimer: The sender is solely responsible for the content of this message.
X-Sender: [email-masked]
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0b36 (32)
Original-To: "GNU-Win32" <[email-masked]>
Original-Sender: [email-masked]

At 03:21 PM 12/4/96 -0800, you wrote:
>>If they have to re-write they might as well just move to the
>>Win32 api. The really interesting task would be to get a
>>description of the 'real' NT API, not the Win32 overlay,
>>I mean the one that executables flagged as 'NT Native'
>>use. I believe that there may be calls in there that
>>would enable a much better POSIX emulation (as this is
>>the API that the NT POSIX subsystem is based on).

What about Win95?  Are you planning on having GNU-Win32
behave differently on Win95 and WinNT?

Mike Traffanstead

-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".