Subject: Re: Default linker output filename
From: [email-masked] (Heinz Hemken)

6 Nov 1996 18:57:27 -0800
Sender: [email-masked]
Approved: [email-masked]
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]>
Reply-To: [email-masked]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (WinNT; I)
Original-To: [email-masked]
Original-Sender: [email-masked]

Long Doan wrote:
> I think it would be better if a.out is a link instead of a.out.exe,
> since Windows won't be able to execute a link. On the other hand, why
> don't we just use bash (or some other shells) and be happy with a.out?

Or you could always just do

gcc -o blabla.exe blabla.c foo.c bar.c

or some such.

-- 
Heinz Hemken
http://www.cell.cinvestav.mx/hh/bchh.html
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".