Subject: Re: Use GDB for not GCC's exes
From: [email-masked]

23 Oct 1996 11:35:00 -0700
Sender: [email-masked]
Approved: [email-masked]
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
References: <[email-masked]>
			<[email-masked]>
			<[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; AIX 2)
Original-To: [email-masked]
Original-Cc: Michael Snyder <[email-masked]>
Original-Sender: [email-masked]

> Michael Snyder wrote:
> >
> > be a highly desireable secondary goal.  Whether that will happen is at
> > least in part dependant on who would want it and how badly.  Does
> > anybody else think that using gdb to debug code compiled with
> > MicroSoft compilers is an important feature?

Oh, yeah, but alternatively you could make gcc generate debugging
information in format understandable by MS debugger, say the one that
is in MS Dev. Studio. While gdb doesn't work on PPC/NT, cygwin32 is
pretty much useless on PPC/NT too, as a developer's environment...

Dmitri Makarov.
[email-masked]
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"[email-masked]" with one line of text: "help".