Message-ID:	<20001022193600.15760.qmail@web5104.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Oct 2000 12:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
From:	geoff stanbury <geeyoph AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Should a non-programmer use pgcc?
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

Hi, I'm not on the mailing list.  Sorry if this is
frustratingly newbie or anything.

I am not a programmer, but I do prefer to compile programs
from source instead of using precompiled binaries.  (I can
vaguely get the gist of c code in simple programs when I look
at the source.)  

PGCC's website implies that using PGCC instead of GCC would
do me well--I am using an i686 linux system.  I would like to
know how to compare programs compiled with PGCC to those
compiled with GCC, so as to see what kind of improvements I
get.  I'm also wondering whether PGCC is really worth the
trouble for me, considering how I don't know much about
programming, benchmarking, or optimizing code.  Thanks in
advance.  

--Geoff
geeyoff AT zerohour DOT net 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf!  It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/

- Raw text -