Message-ID:	<005201bfbe2c$af7397d0$5000f5d1@wt.net>
From:	"Ron" <rdh AT wt DOT net>
To:	<pgcc AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<391EE35C DOT 500CD590 AT asplinux DOT ru> <20000514220955 DOT D3351 AT cerebro DOT laendle>
Subject:	Re: Little MMX codegen typo in 2.95.3-pgcc
Date:	Sun, 14 May 2000 23:15:06 -0600
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id AAA16084
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

This should have spotted this long ago.. That what function prototyping is all about, or can't the compiler match the return type to the function declarations return type??  After reading the -W options quickly nothing jumps out.  But then I'm used to -W[1-4,X] from MSVC.  And MSVC does this...
-R
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To: <pgcc AT delorie DOT com>
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: Little MMX codegen typo in 2.95.3-pgcc


> On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 09:33:16PM +0400, Yuri Pudgorodsky <yur AT asplinux DOT ru> wrote:
> > Almost immediatly I discovered a little typo in i386.c, resulted
> > in garbage assebler output.
> 
> Well spotted & applied to cvs.
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> -- 
>       -----==-                                             |
>       ----==-- _                                           |
>       ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
>       --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
>       -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
>     The choice of a GNU generation                       |
>                                                          |
> 

- Raw text -