Date:	Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:55:42 +0100
From:	Marc Lehmann <marc AT gimp DOT org>
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: K7/Athlon, Thoughts anyone?
Message-ID:	<19991223195542.L1180@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References:	<3860FD5C DOT BDD0C7DF AT lycosmail DOT com> <19991222213526 DOT A13457 AT atrey DOT karlin DOT mff DOT cuni DOT cz> <14433 DOT 31602 DOT 163201 DOT 75391 AT lrz DOT uni-muenchen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<14433.31602.163201.75391@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>; from eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de on Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 05:31:30PM -0800
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.2.13 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version 2.95.1 19990816 (release))
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 05:31:30PM -0800, Eugene Leitl <eugene DOT leitl AT lrz DOT uni-muenchen DOT de> wrote:
> Jan Hubicka writes:
>  
>  > The latest CVS snapshots of gcc already support Athlon. I have some extra
> 
> Does that mean I can code Athlon inline assembly with it?

This is entirely independent of the compiler, it just depends on the
assembler you use. The current version of binutils AFAIK supports all amd
extensions.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -