Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/10/29/18:58:41
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 12:30:13AM -0400, Steve Snyder <swsnyder AT home DOT com> wrote:
> Is the code in the gcc-->pgcc diff actively being worked on, or is the
> same patch code applied to each new version of egcs/gcc as they are
> released?
With former releases I used (almost) the same diff for minor releases,
sicne I developed using the development snapshots of the compiler and
didnīt want to backport fixes (that might break it).
Since I havenīt had time to jump on the current gcc snapshots, I _do_ work on
the current diff.
But as al you know, I was/am/will be seriously busy, so the only changes
you can expect in 2.95.2 are two bug-fixes, some warning patch and a
disabled -fcompare-elim.
> (Obviously the patch files are modified to handling differing version
> strings, etc. It is more the code generation that I have in mind.)
In this and all former (minor) releases, no ground-breaking things have
been added.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -