Message-ID:	<38134004.54280D6@lycosmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Oct 1999 13:21:08 -0400
From:	Adam Schrotenboer <ajschrotenboer AT lycosmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: using cmov* not that great
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 32 DOT 19990926231125 DOT 00c757a0 AT pop DOT xs4all DOT nl> <380A4183 DOT B3794352 AT lycosmail DOT com> <19991018215203 DOT B612 AT cerebro DOT laendle>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

Hadn't thought of that. Thanks for the info.

Marc Lehmann wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 17, 1999 at 05:37:08PM -0400, Adam Schrotenboer <ajschrotenboer AT lycosmail DOT com> wrote:
> > I can not thing of any (intel x86 at least) cpu that can use such.
>
> Sure it can. One can reorder code that it suits static prediction.
>
> > Itanium (stupid name, Merced was better) however I do believe will be
>
> even better, it can just execute the if branch speculatively and then use
> the equivalent of cmov/cadd. calculating two much in many cases hurts less
> than a single jump.
>
> --
>       -----==-                                             |
>       ----==-- _                                           |
>       ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
>       --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
>       -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
>     The choice of a GNU generation                       |
>                                                          |

- Raw text -