Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/08/04/02:13:50.2
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 08:32:58PM +0200, jkf AT casema DOT net wrote:
> > It's also in CVS (pgcc-2_95).
> >
> > Enjoy.
> >
>
> I tried the patch
I will need to re-do the patch. However, due to time and
bandwidth-limitations I can't do a diff against the gcc-2.95.tar.gz, only
against the cvs version (which has subtle differences).
And Bernhard, who is usually making (and checking!) the patches is
currently away, so we might wait until 2.95.1 (which should be out in
1999-08-15).
> What seems more serious, using the same pgcc CVS compiler,
> pgcc-2.95 crashes, and gcc-2.95 goes on.
(how did it crach when you couldn't built it?)
> Here are the final reports from building pgcc-2.95:
I can't explain these. But:
> gcc -DIN_GCC -march=pentiumpro -O6 -o ../jc1 \
These are not the standard flags, which suggests you dsidn't follow the
standard installation instructions. Following these and doing a bootstrap
would most likely fix these problems.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -