Message-ID:	<379378F8.F9386326@softhome.net>
Date:	Mon, 19 Jul 1999 21:14:00 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
CC:	poulard AT laas DOT fr, poulard AT actia DOT fr
Subject:	Re: pgcc port for WinNT
References:	<420810190799*/S=hpoulard/O=actia/PRMD=actia/ADMD=atlas/C=fr/@MHS>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

hpoulard AT actia DOT fr wrote:
> 2/ will pgcc with the patch be more
>    efficient than the strict pure egcs ?
>    I guess It will, Nevertheless am hoping :-)
> 3/ Will it be more efficient than VC++5,
>    AM HOPE

Visit http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/compila.html .
Here you will find comprehensive speed comparison 
of VC++, Watcom C++, GCC 2.7.2 - 2.8.1, EGCS/PGCC 1.0.x - 1.1.x,
and still unreleased GCC 2.95/2.96 snapshots.
Also there is analysis of generated assembler code of two
best compilers.

Laurynas Biveinis

- Raw text -