delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Fri, 16 Jul 1999 18:30:45 -0400 |
From: | Igor Schein <igor AT txc DOT com> |
To: | derrick AT cco DOT caltech DOT edu |
Cc: | pgcc AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Do underflows cause a slowdown? Can I fix it? |
Message-Id: | <19990716183045.J24321@deimos.txc.com> |
References: | <378F9D37 DOT EC6D3B6B AT cco DOT caltech DOT edu> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Mutt 0.95.6us |
In-Reply-To: | <378F9D37.EC6D3B6B@cco.caltech.edu>; from Derrick Bass on Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 01:59:35PM -0700 |
Reply-To: | pgcc AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | pgcc AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 01:59:35PM -0700, Derrick Bass wrote: > I am using a Pentium Pro (180 MHz, Redhat 5.2) and some of my FP > intesive code occassionally slows by a factor of 4-6. I think I've > traced this to underflow. . . > > Does handling underflow slow down floating point? Is there a compiler It definitely does. > switch or library call to make the underflows silently get replaced by > zero? Look at -mfp-trap-mode flag. Igor
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |