From:	"David Jonsson" <David DOT Jonsson AT ellemtel DOT se>
To:	<pgcc AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: K7 potentials
Date:	Mon, 5 Jul 1999 08:51:03 +0100
Message-ID:	<000201bec6bb$2124dac0$41d16482@ellemtel.se>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-Reply-To:	<377EAA7B.2938D401@recomnet.net>
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id DAA03197
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Eugene Leitl wrote:
> 
> > David Jonsson writes:
> >
> >  > Expect 10-50% more than PIII. Look at www.amd.se
> >
> > Well, K7 550 MHz 109% SPECint_base95 and 146% SPECfp_base95 if
> > compared to a 550 MHz Pentium III.

You have not read the figures correctly. The figures are 9-46% faster or 109-146% _of_ the performance of a PIII 550 MHz. 

David

- Raw text -