Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/06/21/17:05:45
On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 02:50:14AM -0500, jonathan c mckinney wrote:
> Well, pgcc = egcs+patches, so not sure what your point is.
The point is that egcs != pgcc.
> And I already said that I used the -mcpu=pentiumpro and
> -march=pentiumpro compile options on both with no errors, so you can't
> be right in thinking I used the old egcs.
> I KNOW that's not the case.
Well, _something_ in your mail _must_ be wrong. Either the excerpts
(see below) from the binary (which show that egcs was the compiler) are
inco,plete or wrong, or you did not use pgcc.
> You a newbie too?
Probably.
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 1999 at 03:46:38AM -0500, JonMcK wrote:
> > > 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)^@^@GCC: (GNU) egcs-2.91.66
> > > 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)^@^@GCC: (GNU) egcs-2.91.66
> > > 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2
> > > release)^^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@01.01^@^@^^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@01.01
No sign of pgcc.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -