Date:	Sun, 13 Jun 1999 22:59:36 +0200
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Problem building June 4 snapshot
Message-ID:	<19990613225936.C31417@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References:	<19990604163829 DOT D5013 AT io DOT txc DOT com> <19990610224233 DOT B6618 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <19990611122931 DOT Q28893 AT io DOT txc DOT com> <19990611220455 DOT B2764 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <19990611173107 DOT Z28893 AT io DOT txc DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<19990611173107.Z28893@io.txc.com>; from Igor Schein on Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 05:31:07PM -0400
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.3.6 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.95 19990524 (prerelease) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3)
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 05:31:07PM -0400, Igor Schein wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 10:04:55PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 12:29:31PM -0400, Igor Schein wrote:
> > > > This should be fixed now!
> > > 
> > > Well, I just tried Jun 11 snapshot, and I still get the same error.
> > 
> > Did you get it via CVS?
> 
> tarball

The tarball might have a latency of one day (my timezone is very different to
the servers timezone), so this might explain things.

However, there was another, similar bug in said snapshot, which should be
fixed now (in cvs, not yet the tarball).

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -