Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/05/21/09:22:33
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 08:13:53AM +0000, Jens-Uwe Rumstich wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I was wondering if there is any speculation, q's, etc about what the K7
> > may be capable of.
> >
> > For example:
> > Will the K7 be less "register starved" than the rest of the x86
> > archictecture, or was this simply not possible while maintaining x86
> > compatibility????
>
> It would break the x86-compatibility. The x86 only has 3 bit for the
> registers, so you canīt have more than 8 registers without heavy
> changes in the instruction set :-(
No, it wouldn't. The ppro has much more than 8 registers through register
renaming. Under this light having only three bits for the register might
even improve performance due to better packed instructions.
(No kidding, I expect compressed assembly in the next years, x86 already
comes close!)
> the start of the second fab in Dresden.
Oh, thats great!
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -