Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/05/10/15:56:35
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 09:09:25AM -0700, David Whysong wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Dr H. T. Leung wrote:
>
> >If you had read the mailing list archive, it is terribly unfair to people
> >on the list to cc you replies when you are not on the list. If you want to
> >ask a question, subscribe, read on for a while, then post (then maybe
> >unsubscribe).
>
> That's EXTREMELY strange. Anyway I'm now subscribed to the list. Sorry...
It would be strange, yes ;) Hello, btw!
> Thanks, this is exactly what I wanted to know. Optimizing comiplers like
> egcs/pgcc do "strength reduction", but I wasn't sure if this kind of
strength reduction is only for loops, however, when your code is in a
loop...
A problem with strentgh reduction, however, is that it creates a lot
more registers, which the x86 doens't have, so strentgh reduction might
atcually hurt (though you need it for loop unrolling).
> construct would be taken care of by the compiler, or if I need to do it by
> hand.
It should be automatic, but this is a very extreme case, so this might be
worthwhile!
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -