Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/05/06/17:09:35
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 11:16:57PM +0300, Alex Shnitman wrote:
> release)).
>
> I compiled a program with the -mk6 flag (why was that changed from
> -mamdk6, by the way?),
Because egcs added these switches as -mk6. The rationale was that no -m
option includes the vendor name (-mintelpentium?).
> and it segfaults.
There are definitely problems with 1.1.3. this is related to my backport
of snapshot features (hey people: thats why I don't like backporting fixes
;)
> Then I compiled it with -mk6 -march=i486, and it didn't degfault
Interesting. Are you sure? I ask because you seem to infer from your
example that the amdk6 is counted as a i486 architecture, which you can't
(since then there shouldn't be a difference between both options).
> Why does the K6 qualify as i486 architecture? It's supposed to be
> totally Pentium-compatible, isn't it?
The pentium, the i486 and the amdk6 share the same instruction set
architecture (with regards to a compiler). Both pentium and amdk6 use the
same instructions (i.e. -march=i486)
> The program I was trying to compile is he L.A.M.E. MP3 encoder. I don't
> know what else to attach to you; do you want an strace log, or ltrace
> log, or anything else? Maybe someone had this problem already?
an url where I can fetch that program (and te version numebr you used)
would be perfect unless you know the file that is responsible.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -