Sender:	wayfarer AT arcturus DOT resnet DOT rochester DOT edu
Message-ID:	<37239E2B.1061DBE3@arcturus.resnet.rochester.edu>
Date:	Sun, 25 Apr 1999 22:58:51 +0000
From:	Jason <wayfarer AT arcturus DOT resnet DOT rochester DOT edu>
Organization:	AE0LIS
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.5 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [rms AT gnu DOT org: Re: still no egcs/gcc announcement]
References:	<19990425232217 DOT F24075 AT cerebro DOT laendle>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

[Announcement omitted.]

The question that's on my mind is:  what does this mean for pgcc in terms of
its relationship to egcs/gcc?  Will the optimizations be merged directly into
the new source tree, or will it remain separate, distributed as patches to the
egcs (well, actually gcc now) source?  Has any of this even been determined
yet?  :)


Cheers,

Jason

-- 
"Is it all journey, or is there landfall?"
  --Ellison & van Vogt, "The Human Operators"

- Raw text -