delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/04/24/20:18:58

Sender: wayfarer AT arcturus DOT resnet DOT rochester DOT edu
Message-ID: <37226C59.9D580775@arcturus.resnet.rochester.edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 01:14:01 +0000
From: Jason <wayfarer AT arcturus DOT resnet DOT rochester DOT edu>
Organization: AE0LIS
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.5 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: PGCC 1.1.3, what's different????
References: <19990423171922 DOT 15793 DOT qmail AT www0j DOT netaddress DOT usa DOT net> <37218BB3 DOT C34551FD AT home DOT com>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com

Alexander Rodyukov wrote:
> 
> ADAM SCHROTENBOER wrote:
> >
> > What was changed w/ 1.1.3, other than the fact that it apparrently compiles
> > now?
> >
> > Was the problem fixed, or removed???
>
> Hm, pretty stupid question... were you got it?!
> Latest on their web-site (and ftp) is 1.1.2., latest from CVS
> was (yesterday):
> 
> BOLiVAR:/BUILD[$] /BUILD/usr/bin/gcc -v
> Reading specs from
> /BUILD/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/pgcc-2.93.17/specs
> gcc version pgcc-2.93.17 19990405 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental)
> 

Actually, PGCC 1.1.3 _is_ available.  Despite the name (and what it says on
the download page), it's still based on EGCS 1.1.2.  The URL, for anybody out
there who's still trying to compile PGCC 1.1.2, is:

http://www.goof.com/pcg/data/source/egcs-1.1.2-pgcc-1.1.3.diff.gz

The news section of the main page hasn't been updated to reflect the new patch
(as of this writing), so the release kinda took me by surprise.  :)  However,
it compiles all the way now!  Kudos to the PCG for fixing it!

In response to Adam's question, I don't know exactly what the new patch fixes
(perhaps I'll `diff -Naur` the two patches to see what's different).  There
was a message previously posted here by Rodric Glaser that contained a
quick-fix patch, which restored some code to the egcs-1.1.2 default.  I
suspect this was instrumental in fixing PGCC.  For the message, check the
archives on delorie.com, or (if you want the message _now_) follow this URL:

http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=pgcc/1999/04/22/00:25:54

Curse those signed extensions!  ;)


Cheers,

Jason

-- 
"Is it all journey, or is there landfall?"
  --Ellison & van Vogt, "The Human Operators"

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019